|
HIS GREAT AMBITION
WHICH TRAGICALLY HE WAS UNABLE TO FULFILL, WAS
THAT AFTER THE SOVIET DEFEAT HE WOULD BE ABLE TO VISIT
KABUL AND OFFER PRAYERS TO ALLAH FOR FREEING THE
CITY FROM HIS ENEMIES.
It can, regrettably, be said with more than a touch of
trust, that the Mujahideen 'snatched defeat from the jaws of
victory'. I believe that the process started with the
promotion of General Akhtar to four star rank by President Zia,
and his consequential appointment as Chairman, Joint Chiefs of
Staff Committee. In March, 1987, the tide of war in
Afghanistan was moving slowly but perceptively towards a
guerrilla victory. The Soviets had realized they could not win
on the battlefield. Gorbachev was considering how to make a
military retreat into a political victory in Moscow, and to an
international audience. A withdrawal of the Red Army was
firmly, if covertly, in the Kremlin's agenda. At the moment,
the man who was largely responsible for the Soviet
humiliation, who during eight years had been overtaken in rank
by his peers as he struggled to wage a guerrilla war on a
massive scale against a superpower, was removed from ISI by
promotion.
It came as a shock to Akhtar himself. For a week or so he
declined to formally hand over his duties to his successor,
Major General Hamid Gul, in the forlorn hope that he might be
able to retain control over the Jehad in his new appointment.
It was not to be.
It is my conviction that Akhtar was primarily removed by
Zia to appease the US. Certainly, to promote him out of ISI at
that time would bring personal advantages to the president -
the credit for a likely forthcoming victory for example - but
American pressure was surely the key factor. As I have
explained earlier it was always Akhtar that frustrated
American efforts to take over the training of the Mujahideen,
or to have a say in the allocation of arms, or to by-pass the
political parties in their distribution. To many in the US
Akhtar was seen as having outlive his usefulness by early
1987. They acknowledged that he was the architect of victory
in the field, but once that looked like becoming a reality he
could, indeed should, be dispensed with.
The Americans saw Akhtar as an inflexible supporter of an
Islamic fundamentalist government in Kabul. They believed,
erroneously, that he had for years favoured the fundamentalist
with US purchased supplies on religious grounds. They knew he
was dedicated to a simple military victory, brought about by
the collapse of the Communists in Kabul. The Americans on the
other hadn wanted the Soviets out, but not the fundamentalists
in. They had a |