|
FROM
EAST PAKISTAN DEBACLE TO AFGHAN VICTORY
By: Brigadier (R) Mohammed Yousaf, S. Bt.
Is
it fair to perceive the entire Pakistan Army in light of the
“Hamood-ur-Rehman Commission Report”? Certainly not!
Pakistan Army has a glorious record of sacrifices in the
battlefields made by soldiers, young and senior officers
alike. They have always fought gallantly against heavy odds in
order to defend our country. We have legacies of courage,
bravery and sacrifices from the deserts of “Run of Kutch” in
the south up to the lofty mountains of “Kargil” in the north.
There is history of sacrifices and bravery beyond the call of
duty. The world recognizes the military potential of
Pakistan. We had the same brave soldiers and officers in
East Pakistan.
But the war in East Pakistan with India was lost before it
commenced. It was due to the lack of strategic depth in the
faulty war plan made by a handful of generals. Yet the
individuals, small groups and even a brigade continued
fighting even after the official surrender. Indeed, they made
history with their blood. After a lapse of 30 years, with the
publication of Hamoodur Rehman Report, the image of Pakistan
Army has once again been tarnished and has led to strong
criticism. The military defeat or victory cannot be considered
in isolation. The political decisions and directions have
always played a predominant role in the outcome of all wars
fought in the annals of military history. Unfortunately, in
case of East Pakistan, political and military leadership
failed and India took full advantage of it. It exploited the
prevailing politico- military situation and turned it into a
major military defeat for Pakistan.
Hamoodur Rehman Report certainly warranted another inquiry
into the ‘system of promotions’ in our armed forces. It is
ironic that generals, air marshals and admirals, with major
character failings and moral turpitudes, got promotions to
such coveted ranks. If the system for promotions in the armed
forces was reviewed after 1971 War, we would not have heard
the scandalous involvement of some military brass in the
purchases of guns, tanks, aircrafts and submarines. A
‘General’ was even known to be a drug lord. The senior
military leadership repeatedly becomes questionable. Some
generals were allegedly involved in the political polarization
of the country and ‘one’ even did not hesitate to distribute
taxpayer’s money to political parties to back up his personal
political horses. Their crimes were always covered by the weak
political regimes mostly on the pretext that it will tarnish
the institution of the armed forces. The generals, marshals
and admirals and the institutions of the armed forces are not
Holy Cows. The law of the land must be equally applied to all.
Notwithstanding the above,
Pakistan armed forces have produced generals, marshals and
admirals of highest integrity and professionalism. They have
left their legacies for the coming generations to follow the
path of glory. But their achievements, their impeccable
personal character and their contributions to the armed forces
and our country have not been highlighted to the people of
Pakistan by official media.
To be a warlord in history, a general must win a war.
Pakistan Army did produce one such warlord. The Soviets
invaded
Afghanistan in late December 1979, and threatened the
sovereignty of our nation after reaching our western borders.
Most of the military thinkers, politicians and intellectuals
within the country and abroad were of the opinion that Soviets
would never go back and
Afghanistan
was a lost cause. It was argued that supporting the Mujahideen
would antagonize Soviets. This policy would have implied
subjugating ourselves to the Soviets forever. It is horrifying
to imagine what the Soviets would have made out of our
sovereignty as a nation.
At the outset, Generals Zia and Akhtar were virtually alone
in thinking they could drive the Soviets out of
Afghanistan. General Akhtar was the architect of Afghan Jihad.
He devised the overall military strategy of the jihad from the
outset and skillfully supervised its implementation. He
masterminded the Afghan Jihad for eight long years. With a
handful of young officers, he trained the Afghans in firing
rockets and the most advanced ‘Stinger’ missile so skillfully
that Soviets were left with no options but to leave
Afghanistan.
The overall strategy to drive the Soviets out of
Afghanistan was a classic guerilla warfare of
“death-by-thousands-cuts’’. General Akhtar never once sought
to confront the enemy in a large-scale conventional battle. He
was a great believer in the use of tactical offensive in the
conduct of a guerilla war and always emphasized the need for
the bold and aggressive use of weapons and the need to achieve
a tactical surprise. Ambushes, assassination, attacks on
supply convoys, pipelines and rocket attacks on airfields with
the avoidance of set piece attacks was the only way to win the
war. These tactics and strategies brought successes to the
Afghan Mujahideen in the battlefield. It was the accumulated
effect of “thousands cuts” which forced the Soviets to leave
Afghanistan.
With his military strategy, war management and with the help
of Mujahideen, Akhtar was able to drive the Soviets back into
Russia and saved our future generations from Soviet slavery.
Akhtar, the commander-in chief of Afghan mujahideen, in the
end, gave his life for freedom of the people of
Pakistan and Afghanistan.
He will go down in the history as the only general who took
on the Soviet military machine since the end of World War II –
and win. The nation certainly owes a debt of gratitude to this
“Silent Soldier” for securing our borders against the Soviets.
Indeed, he lived in obscurity, died, as Shaheed but his deeds
will keep him alive forever in the annals of military history
even though he may not be recognized as such officially.
Let’s not look at Hamood-ur-Rehman Commission Report in
isolation. It must be seen in the entire spectrum of our
military history.
East Pakistan debacle is one sad episode but our army has
given us a lot of successes in the battlefields. Our nation
must be proud of these achievements. |